Processors.
Every processor we can source. What each one is designed to do.
Manufacturer specifications for 101 processors, with comparisons between them. What a chip holds once cooling becomes the limit is the question that decides how a machine feels.
Every processor we hold a record for.
Verified against a published specification. The rest render, unindexed, until they are.
81 desktop.
Nearest six per part. Any pair on request below.
Find a processor.
101 processors with a full sheet, grouped by family. A check marks a sheet verified line by line against the manufacturer.
AMD Ryzen 3000 (Matisse, Zen 2)
AMD Ryzen 5000 (Cezanne, Zen 3)
AMD Ryzen 5000 (Vermeer, Zen 3)
AMD Ryzen 7000 (Raphael, Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 8000G (Phoenix 2, Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 8000G (Phoenix, Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9000 (Granite Ridge, Zen 5)
AMD Ryzen 4000 (Renoir, Zen 2)
AMD Ryzen 6000 (Rembrandt, Zen 3+)
AMD Ryzen 7035 (Rembrandt-R, Zen 3+)
AMD Ryzen 7040 (Phoenix, Zen 4)
Intel Alder Lake (12th gen)
Intel Raptor Lake Refresh (14th gen)
Intel Comet Lake (10th gen)
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 (11th gen mobile)
Intel Rocket Lake (11th gen)
Intel Alder Lake-U (12th Gen Core)
Intel Alder Lake-H (12th Gen Core)
Intel Raptor Lake (13th gen)
Intel Raptor Lake-H (13th Gen Core)
Intel Coffee Lake (8th gen)
Intel Coffee Lake Refresh (9th gen)
Intel Alder Lake-H (12th gen mobile)
Intel Raptor Lake-HX (13th Gen Core)
Intel Arrow Lake-S (Core Ultra 200S)
Compare
Any two. Including pairs we never published.
The published comparisons cover the pairs people search for. This covers the rest, including a laptop part against a desktop one, with a note on why that gap is wider in practice than on paper.
Choose two parts above and their specifications will appear here, side by side.
Every figure on a specification sheet is a design target. None of it is a measurement.
Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.
We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.









