Processors.
Every processor we can source. What each one is designed to do.
Manufacturer specifications for 218 processors, with comparisons between them. What a chip holds once cooling becomes the limit is the question that decides how a machine feels.
Every processor we hold a record for.
Verified against a published specification. The rest render, unindexed, until they are.
138 desktop.
Nearest six per part. Any pair on request below.
Processor specifications, checked and compared
This is the SystemCheck processor catalogue: manufacturer specifications for 218 processors (cores, threads, base and boost clocks, cache and rated power), each sheet checked against a published source, with 793 side-by-side comparisons between close rivals. 138 are desktop parts and 80 are laptop parts. The wider catalogue holds 1,737 records; the other 1,519 stay out of the index until their sheets are complete enough to publish. A figure we could not verify reads "Not verified" rather than a guess.
There are three ways to use it. Search for your processor below to read its full sheet and its sources. Open a published comparison when you are choosing between two processors, or use the picker further down for any pair we have not published. Or, if you already own the machine, skip the sheet and run the free 3-minute browser test, which loads the processor, memory and graphics in turn and records what each delivers the whole way through.
A specification sheet describes what a processor is designed to do. Two machines with the same part can behave very differently once their cooling and power settings come into play, and no sheet records either. That is why every processor page here ends with what the sheet cannot tell you, and why the test measures the machine rather than the model number.
Good places to start
Find a processor.
218 processors with a full sheet, grouped by family. A check marks a sheet verified line by line against the manufacturer.
AMD A-Series (Richland)
AMD Athlon
AMD FX
AMD FX (Vishera)
AMD Ryzen 1000
AMD Ryzen 3000
AMD Ryzen 200 (Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 2000
AMD Ryzen 3000 (Matisse, Zen 2)
AMD Ryzen 5000 (Cezanne, Zen 3)
AMD Ryzen 5000 (Vermeer, Zen 3)
AMD Ryzen 7000 (Raphael, Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 8000G (Phoenix 2, Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 8000G (Phoenix, Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 8040 (Hawk Point, Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9000 (Granite Ridge, Zen 5)
AMD Ryzen 4000 (Renoir, Zen 2)
AMD Ryzen 6000 (Rembrandt, Zen 3+)
AMD Ryzen 7035 (Rembrandt-R, Zen 3+)
AMD Ryzen 7040 (Phoenix, Zen 4)
AMD Ryzen 9000HX (Fire Range, Zen 5)
AMD Ryzen AI 300 (Strix Point, Zen 5)
AMD Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5)
AMD Ryzen AI Max (Strix Halo, Zen 5)
Apple Apple M5
Apple Apple M6
Intel Core 10th generation
Intel Core 12th generation
Intel Alder Lake (12th gen)
Intel Raptor Lake Refresh (14th gen)
Intel Core 3rd generation
Intel Core 4th generation
Intel Intel
Intel Core 9th generation
Intel Comet Lake (10th gen)
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 (11th gen mobile)
Intel Rocket Lake (11th gen)
Intel Tiger Lake-UP3 (11th Gen Core)
Intel Core 11th generation
Intel Alder Lake-U (12th Gen Core)
Intel Alder Lake-H (12th Gen Core)
Intel Raptor Lake (13th gen)
Intel Raptor Lake-H (13th Gen Core)
Intel Raptor Lake Refresh HX (14th gen mobile)
Intel Core 2nd generation
Intel Core 6th generation
Intel Core 7th generation
Intel Core 8th generation
Intel Coffee Lake (8th gen)
Intel Coffee Lake Refresh (9th gen)
Intel Alder Lake-H (12th gen mobile)
Intel Raptor Lake-HX (13th Gen Core)
Intel Core Ultra 100 (Meteor Lake)
Intel Arrow Lake-S (Core Ultra 200S)
Intel Core Ultra 200H (Arrow Lake)
Intel Core Ultra 200V (Lunar Lake)
Intel Core Ultra 200HX (Arrow Lake)
Intel Arrow Lake Refresh (Core Ultra 200S Plus)
Intel Core Ultra Series 3 (Panther Lake)
Compare
Any two. Including pairs we never published.
The published comparisons cover the pairs people search for. This covers the rest, including a laptop part against a desktop one, with a note on why that gap is wider in practice than on paper.
Choose two parts above and their specifications will appear here, side by side.
Questions
From manufacturer specifications. Each processor page lists the sources its figures were checked against, and any value we could not check renders as "Not verified" instead of being filled in from elsewhere.
A processor is indexed once its sheet is complete enough to publish. The other 1,519 still have a page if you reach one, but stay out of search and out of this list until the missing figures are verified.
Yes. The 793 published comparisons cover each part's nearest rivals. The comparison picker on this page builds any other pair from the catalogue on request.
The clocks on a sheet are what the part is designed to reach. What it holds under a long load depends on the cooling and power limits of the machine around it. The free 3-minute browser test measures what your machine actually sustains and names the shape of the curve.
No. No browser exposes temperature, fan speed or power draw. Where a SystemCheck report names a likely cause, it is inferred from the throughput curve and labelled as an inference, and a sensor tool confirms it.
Every figure on a specification sheet is a design target. None of it is a measurement.
Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.
We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.









