Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Graphics cards/Comparison

13 specifications

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

On paper, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT carries more memory (20 GB against 16 GB), and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT has a wider memory bus. Shading-unit counts are not directly comparable across different architectures, so read that row as context rather than a verdict. Specifications describe what each card is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT compared with AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, specification by specification
12 specifications · 3 with a higher side

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

AMD · Radeon RX 7000 · Desktop

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

AMD · Radeon RX 9000 · Desktop

Compute

Architecture
RDNA 3
RDNA 4 (Navi 48)
Shading units
Not verified
4,096
Base clock
Not verified
Not verified
Boost clock
2400 MHz
2970 MHz (higher on this specification)
Game clock
2000 MHz
Not verified
Compute units
84
Not verified

Memory

Memory
20 GB (higher on this specification)
16 GB
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory bus
320-bit (higher on this specification)
256-bit

Power and platform

TDP
300 W
304 W
Process
5 nm
4 nm
Launched
2022-12-13
2025-03-06

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

3 years apart

The RX 9070 XT (RDNA 4 (Navi 48), 2025) is 3 years newer than the RX 7900 XT (RDNA 3, 2022). A newer architecture brings more than speed: newer video encoders and decoders, newer upscaling and frame generation, and a longer run of driver updates ahead of it.

Video memory

The RX 7900 XT has 20 GB of video memory against 16 GB. Memory does not make a card faster until it runs out, and then the drop is sharp: textures spill into system memory and frame times stutter. High resolutions, high texture settings, heavy mods and running AI models locally are what fill it.

Memory bus

The RX 7900 XT moves data over a 320-bit bus of GDDR6; the RX 9070 XT uses 256-bit GDDR6. The bus width and the memory type together set how fast the chip can reach its own memory, which shows at high resolutions where every frame moves more data. A narrow bus with fast memory can match a wide one with slow memory, so neither figure settles it alone.

Board power

The RX 9070 XT draws up to 304 W against 300 W. That is heat the case has to exhaust and current the power supply has to deliver: allow a supply of about 750 W for the RX 9070 XT with a typical processor, and check the card's power connectors against the supply's. A card that cannot shed its heat does not fail. It lowers its clocks after a few minutes, which is the frame rate that falls the longer you play.

Which to pick, on paper

High resolutions, heavy textures, local AI
RX 7900 XT
20 GB against 16 GB. Memory is the wall these workloads hit first.
A small case or a modest power supply
RX 7900 XT
300 W against 304 W: less heat, fewer power connectors, quieter fans.

What no table says

How much of its speed a graphics card keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Questions

Is the RX 7900 XT better than the RX 9070 XT?
By need, on the specifications: high resolutions, heavy textures, local ai: the RX 7900 XT; a small case or a modest power supply: the RX 7900 XT. They are different designs, so the raw counts cannot rank them. Frame rates depend on the game and its settings, and how much speed either card keeps after ten minutes depends on its cooling, which is what a sustained test measures.
Is 16 GB of video memory enough?
For 1080p at sensible settings, yes in most games. At 1440p and above, with high texture settings, or for running AI models, 20 GB gives real headroom. When memory runs out the symptom is stutter, not a lower average.
What power supply does the RX 9070 XT need?
Allow about 750 W with a typical processor, and make sure the supply has the power connectors the card uses. The RX 7900 XT at 300 W is easier on both.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a graphics card behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.