Graphics cards/Comparison
13 specifications
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
On paper, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB has more shading units, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 has a wider memory bus. Specifications describe what each card is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
NVIDIA · GeForce RTX 50 · Desktop
AMD Radeon RX 6800
AMD · Radeon RX 6000 · Desktop
Compute
Memory
Power and platform
A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.
Reading the table
What the difference means.
5 years apart
The RTX 5060 Ti 16GB (Blackwell, 2025) is 5 years newer than the RX 6800 (Radeon RX 6000, 2020). A newer architecture brings more than speed: newer video encoders and decoders, newer upscaling and frame generation, and a longer run of driver updates ahead of it.
Video memory
Both carry 16 GB, so neither has the advantage where memory is the limit: high resolutions, heavy textures and local AI models fill both at the same point.
Memory bus
The RX 6800 moves data over a 256-bit bus of GDDR6; the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB uses 128-bit GDDR7. The bus width and the memory type together set how fast the chip can reach its own memory, which shows at high resolutions where every frame moves more data. A narrow bus with fast memory can match a wide one with slow memory, so neither figure settles it alone.
Shading units
The counts differ, 4,608 against 3,840, but these are different designs from different makers, and a shading unit on one is not the same amount of work as on the other. The row cannot be used to rank this pair.
Board power
The RX 6800 draws up to 250 W against 180 W. That is heat the case has to exhaust and current the power supply has to deliver: allow a supply of about 650 W for the RX 6800 with a typical processor, and check the card's power connectors against the supply's. A card that cannot shed its heat does not fail. It lowers its clocks after a few minutes, which is the frame rate that falls the longer you play.
Which to pick, on paper
- A small case or a modest power supply
- RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
- 180 W against 250 W: less heat, fewer power connectors, quieter fans.
What no table says
How much of its speed a graphics card keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.
Questions
- Is the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB better than the RX 6800?
- By need, on the specifications: a small case or a modest power supply: the RTX 5060 Ti 16GB. They are different designs, so the raw counts cannot rank them. Frame rates depend on the game and its settings, and how much speed either card keeps after ten minutes depends on its cooling, which is what a sustained test measures.
- What power supply does the RX 6800 need?
- Allow about 650 W with a typical processor, and make sure the supply has the power connectors the card uses. The RTX 5060 Ti 16GB at 180 W is easier on both.
More comparisons
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
- NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
- AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
- AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
- AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
- AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
- AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT
Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.
Nothing above describes how a graphics card behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.
We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.