Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Graphics cards/Comparison

13 specifications

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

On paper, the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT has more shading units, and the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT has a wider memory bus. Specifications describe what each card is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB compared with AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, specification by specification
12 specifications · 3 with a higher side

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB

NVIDIA · GeForce RTX 40 · Desktop

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT

AMD · Radeon RX 6000 · Desktop

Compute

Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Not verified
Shading units
4,352
4,608 (higher on this specification)
Base clock
2310 MHz
Not verified
Boost clock
2540 MHz (higher on this specification)
2250 MHz
Game clock
Not verified
2015 MHz
Compute units
Not verified
72

Memory

Memory
16 GB
16 GB
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory bus
128-bit
256-bit (higher on this specification)

Power and platform

TDP
165 W
300 W
Process
Not verified
Not verified
Launched
2023-07
2020-11-18

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

3 years apart

The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB (Ada Lovelace, 2023) is 3 years newer than the RX 6800 XT (Radeon RX 6000, 2020). A newer architecture brings more than speed: newer video encoders and decoders, newer upscaling and frame generation, and a longer run of driver updates ahead of it.

Video memory

Both carry 16 GB, so neither has the advantage where memory is the limit: high resolutions, heavy textures and local AI models fill both at the same point.

Memory bus

The RX 6800 XT moves data over a 256-bit bus of GDDR6; the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB uses 128-bit GDDR6. The bus width and the memory type together set how fast the chip can reach its own memory, which shows at high resolutions where every frame moves more data. A narrow bus with fast memory can match a wide one with slow memory, so neither figure settles it alone.

Shading units

The counts differ, 4,608 against 4,352, but these are different designs from different makers, and a shading unit on one is not the same amount of work as on the other. The row cannot be used to rank this pair.

Board power

The RX 6800 XT draws up to 300 W against 165 W. That is heat the case has to exhaust and current the power supply has to deliver: allow a supply of about 750 W for the RX 6800 XT with a typical processor, and check the card's power connectors against the supply's. A card that cannot shed its heat does not fail. It lowers its clocks after a few minutes, which is the frame rate that falls the longer you play.

Which to pick, on paper

A small case or a modest power supply
RTX 4060 Ti 16GB
165 W against 300 W: less heat, fewer power connectors, quieter fans.

What no table says

How much of its speed a graphics card keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Questions

Is the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB better than the RX 6800 XT?
By need, on the specifications: a small case or a modest power supply: the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB. They are different designs, so the raw counts cannot rank them. Frame rates depend on the game and its settings, and how much speed either card keeps after ten minutes depends on its cooling, which is what a sustained test measures.
What power supply does the RX 6800 XT need?
Allow about 750 W with a typical processor, and make sure the supply has the power connectors the card uses. The RTX 4060 Ti 16GB at 165 W is easier on both.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a graphics card behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.