15 specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H vs AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

On paper, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 carries more L3 cache. Specifications describe what each chip is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

11 specifications · 3 with a higher side

Full specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 255H

Intel · Core Ultra 200H (Arrow Lake) · Laptop

Full specifications

AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395

AMD · Ryzen AI Max (Strix Halo, Zen 5) · Laptop

Cores and clocks

Cores

Threads

Base clock

2.0 GHz

3.0 GHz

Boost clock

5.1 GHz

Cache and power

L3 cache

24 MB

64 MB

TDP

28 W

45 to 120 W

Total cache (L2 + L3)

Not verified

80 MB

Platform

Socket

FCBGA2049

FP11

Process

3 nm

4 nm

Integrated graphics

Intel Arc 140T GPU

AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics

Launched

Q1'25 (quarter)

Not verified

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

Cores and threads

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads against 16 and 16. More threads help with work that can be split into many pieces at once: rendering, compiling, video export, running several heavy programs together. They do little for work that runs on a few threads, which includes most games and most everyday software, where the speed of one core decides the result.

Cache

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 carries 64 MB of L3 cache against 24 MB. Cache is fast memory on the chip, and a larger one means the cores wait on main memory less often. Games, large spreadsheets and compiling respond to it; rendering and video export, which stream through data in order, respond much less.

Power and cooling

The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is rated at 120 W against 28 W. The rating is the heat the cooler has to move for the chip to hold its speed, and modern chips draw well above it in short bursts. In a laptop the maker chooses the real limit inside a range, so the same chip can behave like two different processors in two machines. That spread is what a sustained test measures and a specification sheet cannot. A chip whose cooling falls short does not fail. It slows down, and it does so after the first minute, which is why short benchmarks miss it.

Platform

Laptop processors are soldered to the board, so this is a choice between machines, not between chips you can swap. What differs between two laptops with these parts is mostly the power limit and the cooling the maker gave each one.

Manufacturing process

The Core Ultra 7 255H is built on a 3 nm process against 4 nm. A finer process generally does the same work for less power. The names are marketing labels rather than measurements, though, and they are not comparable between manufacturers, so treat the row as a sign of how recent the design is and no more.

Which to pick, on paper

Rendering, compiling, video export: Ryzen AI Max+ 395; 32 threads against 16. Work that uses every thread scales with how many there are.
A quiet or compact build: Core Ultra 7 255H; 28 W against 120 W: less heat to move, so a smaller cooler and slower fans.

What no table says

How much of its speed a processor keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Free CPU stress test

Questions

Is the Core Ultra 7 255H better than the Ryzen AI Max+ 395?: By need, on the specifications: rendering, compiling, video export: the Ryzen AI Max+ 395; a quiet or compact build: the Core Ultra 7 255H. No specification says how much speed either one keeps under a long load; that depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in, and it is what a sustained test measures.
Do the Core Ultra 7 255H and the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 use the same socket?: Laptop processors are soldered in place, so neither can be swapped for the other.
Does the Core Ultra 7 255H or the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 have integrated graphics?: Both do: Intel Arc 140T GPU on the Core Ultra 7 255H and AMD Radeon 8060S Graphics on the Ryzen AI Max+ 395.
Which runs hotter, the Core Ultra 7 255H or the Ryzen AI Max+ 395?: The Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is rated at 120 W against 28 W, so it produces more heat under load and needs the larger cooler. How hot either one actually runs depends on the cooler and the case more than on the chip.

More comparisons

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.

Run the test on your machine How we measure →