Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Graphics cards/Comparison

13 specifications

AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

On paper, the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT has more shading units. Specifications describe what each card is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

AMD Radeon RX 6600 compared with AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, specification by specification
12 specifications · 2 with a higher side

AMD Radeon RX 6600

AMD · Radeon RX 6000 · Desktop

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT

AMD · Radeon RX 6000 · Desktop

Compute

Architecture
RDNA 2 (Navi 23)
Not verified
Shading units
1,792
2,048 (higher on this specification)
Base clock
1626 MHz
Not verified
Boost clock
2491 MHz
2589 MHz (higher on this specification)
Game clock
Not verified
2359 MHz
Compute units
Not verified
32

Memory

Memory
8 GB
8 GB
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory bus
128-bit
128-bit

Power and platform

TDP
132 W
160 W
Process
7 nm
Not verified
Launched
2021-10-13
2021-08-11

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

Video memory

Both carry 8 GB, so neither has the advantage where memory is the limit: high resolutions, heavy textures and local AI models fill both at the same point.

Shading units

The counts differ, 2,048 against 1,792, but these are different designs, and a shading unit on one is not the same amount of work as on the other. The row cannot be used to rank this pair.

Board power

The RX 6600 XT draws up to 160 W against 132 W. That is heat the case has to exhaust and current the power supply has to deliver: allow a supply of about 550 W for the RX 6600 XT with a typical processor, and check the card's power connectors against the supply's. A card that cannot shed its heat does not fail. It lowers its clocks after a few minutes, which is the frame rate that falls the longer you play.

Which to pick, on paper

A small case or a modest power supply
RX 6600
132 W against 160 W: less heat, fewer power connectors, quieter fans.

What no table says

How much of its speed a graphics card keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Questions

Is the RX 6600 better than the RX 6600 XT?
By need, on the specifications: a small case or a modest power supply: the RX 6600. They are different designs, so the raw counts cannot rank them. Frame rates depend on the game and its settings, and how much speed either card keeps after ten minutes depends on its cooling, which is what a sustained test measures.
What power supply does the RX 6600 XT need?
Allow about 550 W with a typical processor, and make sure the supply has the power connectors the card uses. The RX 6600 at 132 W is easier on both.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a graphics card behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.