Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Graphics cards/Comparison

13 specifications

AMD Radeon RX 580 vs AMD Radeon RX 590

On the specifications we can verify, the AMD Radeon RX 580 and the AMD Radeon RX 590 are closely matched. Which one is faster in your machine depends on cooling and sustained behaviour rather than on anything printed here.

AMD Radeon RX 580 compared with AMD Radeon RX 590, specification by specification
11 specifications · 2 with a higher side

AMD Radeon RX 580

AMD · Radeon RX 500 · Desktop

AMD Radeon RX 590

AMD · Radeon RX 500 · Desktop

Compute

Architecture
Polaris
Not verified
Shading units
2,304
2,304
Base clock
1257 MHz
1469 MHz (higher on this specification)
Boost clock
1340 MHz
1545 MHz (higher on this specification)
Compute units
36
36

Memory

Memory
8 GB
8 GB
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory bus
256-bit
256-bit

Power and platform

TDP
185 W
Not verified
Process
Not verified
Not verified
Launched
2017-04-18
2018-11-15

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

A year apart

The RX 590 (Radeon RX 500, 2018) is a year newer than the RX 580 (Polaris, 2017). A newer architecture brings more than speed: newer video encoders and decoders, newer upscaling and frame generation, and a longer run of driver updates ahead of it.

Video memory

Both carry 8 GB, so neither has the advantage where memory is the limit: high resolutions, heavy textures and local AI models fill both at the same point.

What no table says

How much of its speed a graphics card keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Questions

Is the RX 580 better than the RX 590?
On the specifications they are closely matched. They are different designs, so the raw counts cannot rank them. Frame rates depend on the game and its settings, and how much speed either card keeps after ten minutes depends on its cooling, which is what a sustained test measures.
Can the RX 580 and the RX 590 be compared on these figures alone?
Only in part. The board power is not verified for one of the two, so that row cannot rank them. They are different designs, so counts such as shading units do not convert one to one. Running the same sustained graphics test on each machine gives a figure that can be compared directly.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a graphics card behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.