Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Graphics cards/Comparison

13 specifications

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU

On paper, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU has more shading units. Shading-unit counts are not directly comparable across different architectures, so read that row as context rather than a verdict. Specifications describe what each card is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU compared with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU, specification by specification
10 specifications · 1 with a higher side

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA · GeForce RTX 40 Laptop · Laptop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Laptop GPU

NVIDIA · GeForce RTX 50 Laptop · Laptop

Compute

Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Blackwell
Shading units
4,608 (higher on this specification)
3,328
Base clock
Not verified
Not verified
Boost clock
1230 to 2175 MHz
1455 to 2497 MHz

Memory

Memory
8 GB
8 GB
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory bus
128-bit
128-bit

Power and platform

TDP
35 to 115 W
45 to 100 W
Process
Not verified
Not verified
Launched
2023-02-22
2025-05-19

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

2 years apart

The RTX 5060 Laptop GPU (Blackwell, 2025) is 2 years newer than the RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (Ada Lovelace, 2023). A newer architecture brings more than speed: newer video encoders and decoders, newer upscaling and frame generation, and a longer run of driver updates ahead of it.

Video memory

Both carry 8 GB, so neither has the advantage where memory is the limit: high resolutions, heavy textures and local AI models fill both at the same point.

Memory bus

The RTX 4070 Laptop GPU moves data over a 128-bit bus of GDDR6; the RTX 5060 Laptop GPU uses 128-bit GDDR7. The bus width and the memory type together set how fast the chip can reach its own memory, which shows at high resolutions where every frame moves more data. A narrow bus with fast memory can match a wide one with slow memory, so neither figure settles it alone.

Shading units

The counts differ, 4,608 against 3,328, but these are different designs, and a shading unit on one is not the same amount of work as on the other. The row cannot be used to rank this pair.

Power range

NVIDIA rates the RTX 4070 Laptop GPU at 35 to 115 W and the RTX 5060 Laptop GPU at 45 to 100 W of GPU subsystem power, and the laptop maker chooses where in that range each machine runs. The same chip near the bottom of its range and near the top are two different products under one name, and because these ranges overlap, a machine that gives one chip more power can close much of the gap to the other. The figure that settles it is the wattage the laptop's own specification lists.

What no table says

How much of its speed a graphics card keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Questions

Is the RTX 4070 Laptop GPU better than the RTX 5060 Laptop GPU?
On the specifications they are closely matched. They are different designs, so the raw counts cannot rank them. Frame rates depend on the game and its settings, and how much speed either card keeps after ten minutes depends on its cooling, which is what a sustained test measures.
Why does the RTX 4070 Laptop GPU perform differently from one laptop to another?
Because the laptop maker sets its power anywhere from 35 to 115 W, and its boost clock from 1230 to 2175 MHz with it. Cooling then decides how much of that the chip keeps under a long load, which is what a sustained test measures.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a graphics card behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.