Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Graphics cards/Comparison

13 specifications

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

On paper, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 has more shading units. Specifications describe what each card is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti compared with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060, specification by specification
10 specifications · 3 with a higher side

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

NVIDIA · GeForce GTX 16 · Desktop

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060

NVIDIA · GeForce RTX 20 · Desktop

Compute

Architecture
Turing
Turing
Shading units
1,536
1,920 (higher on this specification)
Base clock
1500 MHz (higher on this specification)
1370 MHz
Boost clock
1770 MHz (higher on this specification)
1680 MHz

Memory

Memory
6 GB
6 GB
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory bus
192-bit
192-bit

Power and platform

TDP
120 W
160 W
Process
Not verified
Not verified
Launched
2019-02-22
2019-01-15

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

The same architecture

Both are Turing cards from NVIDIA, so their figures can be read against each other directly, and the features are the same on both. The differences in the table are the whole difference.

Video memory

Both carry 6 GB, so neither has the advantage where memory is the limit: high resolutions, heavy textures and local AI models fill both at the same point.

Shading units

The RTX 2060 has 1,920 shading units against 1,536, 25 percent more of the same kind of core. Within one architecture that is the clearest single guide to how much more work the chip can do, provided it is given the power and cooling to use them.

Board power

The RTX 2060 draws up to 160 W against 120 W. That is heat the case has to exhaust and current the power supply has to deliver: allow a supply of about 550 W for the RTX 2060 with a typical processor, and check the card's power connectors against the supply's. A card that cannot shed its heat does not fail. It lowers its clocks after a few minutes, which is the frame rate that falls the longer you play.

Which to pick, on paper

A small case or a modest power supply
GTX 1660 Ti
120 W against 160 W: less heat, fewer power connectors, quieter fans.

What no table says

How much of its speed a graphics card keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Questions

Is the GTX 1660 Ti better than the RTX 2060?
By need, on the specifications: a small case or a modest power supply: the GTX 1660 Ti. They share an architecture, so the table is a fair guide. Frame rates depend on the game and its settings, and how much speed either card keeps after ten minutes depends on its cooling, which is what a sustained test measures.
What power supply does the RTX 2060 need?
Allow about 550 W with a typical processor, and make sure the supply has the power connectors the card uses. The GTX 1660 Ti at 120 W is easier on both.
Do the GTX 1660 Ti and the RTX 2060 have the same features?
Yes. Both are Turing designs from NVIDIA, so they share the same generation of video encoders and decoders, upscaling and driver support. What separates them is in the table: how much of the chip each one has, and how much power it is given.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a graphics card behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.