15 specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X vs AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

On paper, the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X has more cores (8 against 6), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X boosts higher. Specifications describe what each chip is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

10 specifications · 4 with a higher side

Full specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

AMD · Ryzen 7000 (Raphael, Zen 4) · Desktop

Full specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 3700X

AMD · Ryzen 3000 (Matisse, Zen 2) · Desktop

Cores and clocks

Cores

Threads

Base clock

4.7 GHz

3.6 GHz

Boost clock

5.3 GHz

4.4 GHz

Cache and power

L3 cache

32 MB

TDP

105 W

65 W

Platform

Socket

AM5

AM4

Process

5 nm

7 nm

Integrated graphics

AMD Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2, 2 CU, 2.2 GHz boost)

None

Launched

2022-09-27

2019-07-07

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

3 years apart

The Ryzen 5 7600X (Ryzen 7000 (Raphael, Zen 4), 2022) is 3 years newer than the Ryzen 7 3700X (Ryzen 3000 (Matisse, Zen 2), 2019). That matters more than any single row in the table, because a newer design usually does more work in each clock cycle. Clock speeds are only a fair comparison between chips of the same generation; across a gap this wide, a lower number on the newer chip can still be the faster core.

Cores and threads

The Ryzen 7 3700X has 8 cores and 16 threads against 6 and 12. More threads help with work that can be split into many pieces at once: rendering, compiling, video export, running several heavy programs together. They do little for work that runs on a few threads, which includes most games and most everyday software, where the speed of one core decides the result.

Boost clock

The Ryzen 5 7600X boosts to 5.3 GHz against 4.4 GHz, 20 percent higher. Across generations it is not a guide to speed on its own, for the reason above. Boost is also a peak: it is held for seconds to minutes, on one or two cores, while the cooling and the power limit allow. What either chip settles at under a long load is lower, and it depends on the cooler and the motherboard as much as the chip.

Power and cooling

The Ryzen 5 7600X is rated at 105 W against 65 W. The rating is the heat the cooler has to move for the chip to hold its speed, and modern chips draw well above it in short bursts. A competent tower cooler suits the Ryzen 5 7600X; the Ryzen 7 3700X is easier to keep quiet and fits smaller cases. A chip whose cooling falls short does not fail. It slows down, and it does so after the first minute, which is why short benchmarks miss it.

Platform

They use different sockets, AM5 and AM4, so moving from one to the other means a new motherboard, and new memory as well: AM5 takes DDR5, AM4 takes DDR4. For an upgrade, that cost belongs in the comparison; for a new build, the newer platform is the one with later chips still to come.

Graphics on the chip

The Ryzen 5 7600X includes AMD Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2, 2 CU, 2.2 GHz boost); the Ryzen 7 3700X has no graphics of its own and will not show a picture without a graphics card. For a build with a card that changes nothing. For an office machine, a home server, or while waiting for a card, it decides the question.

Manufacturing process

The Ryzen 5 7600X is built on a 5 nm process against 7 nm. A finer process generally does the same work for less power. The names are marketing labels rather than measurements, though, and they are not comparable between manufacturers, so treat the row as a sign of how recent the design is and no more.

Which to pick, on paper

Rendering, compiling, video export: Ryzen 7 3700X; 16 threads against 12. Work that uses every thread scales with how many there are.
A quiet or compact build: Ryzen 7 3700X; 65 W against 105 W: less heat to move, so a smaller cooler and slower fans.
No graphics card: Ryzen 5 7600X; It has AMD Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2, 2 CU, 2.2 GHz boost) on the chip. The other needs a card to display anything.

What no table says

How much of its speed a processor keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Free CPU stress test

Questions

Is the Ryzen 5 7600X better than the Ryzen 7 3700X?: The Ryzen 5 7600X is the newer design by 3 years, which usually means faster cores. By need, on the specifications: rendering, compiling, video export: the Ryzen 7 3700X; a quiet or compact build: the Ryzen 7 3700X; no graphics card: the Ryzen 5 7600X. No specification says how much speed either one keeps under a long load; that depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in, and it is what a sustained test measures.
Do the Ryzen 5 7600X and the Ryzen 7 3700X use the same socket?: No. The Ryzen 5 7600X uses AM5 and the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4, so switching means a new motherboard and new memory.
Does the Ryzen 5 7600X or the Ryzen 7 3700X have integrated graphics?: Only the Ryzen 5 7600X, which has AMD Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2, 2 CU, 2.2 GHz boost). The Ryzen 7 3700X needs a graphics card to show a picture.
Which runs hotter, the Ryzen 5 7600X or the Ryzen 7 3700X?: The Ryzen 5 7600X is rated at 105 W against 65 W, so it produces more heat under load and needs the larger cooler. How hot either one actually runs depends on the cooler and the case more than on the chip.

More comparisons

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.

Run the test on your machine How we measure →