Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Processors/Comparison

15 specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H vs Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

On paper, the Intel Core Ultra X7 358H boosts higher. Specifications describe what each chip is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H compared with Intel Core Ultra X7 358H, specification by specification
12 specifications · 1 with a higher side

Intel Core Ultra 7 356H

Intel · Core Ultra Series 3 (Panther Lake) · Laptop

Intel Core Ultra X7 358H

Intel · Core Ultra Series 3 (Panther Lake) · Laptop

Cores and clocks

Cores
16
16
Threads
16
16
Base clock
1.9 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost clock
4.7 GHz
4.8 GHz (higher on this specification)

Cache and power

L3 cache
18 MB
18 MB
TDP
25 W
25 W
Maximum turbo power
80 W
80 W
Minimum assured power
15 W
15 W

Platform

Socket
FCBGA2540
FCBGA2540
Process
Not verified
Not verified
Integrated graphics
Intel Graphics
Intel Arc B390 GPU
Launched
Q1'26 (quarter)
Q1'26 (quarter)

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

The same generation

Both are Core Ultra Series 3 (Panther Lake) parts, so their figures can be read against each other directly: the same kind of core, the same memory support, the same platform. The differences in the table are the whole difference.

Boost clock

The Core Ultra X7 358H boosts to 4.8 GHz against 4.7 GHz, 2 percent higher. Within one generation that is a fair guide to single-core speed. Boost is also a peak: it is held for seconds to minutes, on one or two cores, while the cooling and the power limit allow. What either chip settles at under a long load is lower, and it depends on the cooler and the motherboard as much as the chip.

Power and cooling

Both are rated at 25 W, so they ask the same of a cooler and a power supply. The rating is the heat to be moved for the chip to hold its speed; both draw above it in short bursts, and either one slows down rather than fails when the cooling falls short.

Platform

Laptop processors are soldered to the board, so this is a choice between machines, not between chips you can swap. What differs between two laptops with these parts is mostly the power limit and the cooling the maker gave each one.

What no table says

How much of its speed a processor keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Questions

Is the Core Ultra 7 356H better than the Core Ultra X7 358H?
On the specifications they are closely matched. No specification says how much speed either one keeps under a long load; that depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in, and it is what a sustained test measures.
Do the Core Ultra 7 356H and the Core Ultra X7 358H use the same socket?
Laptop processors are soldered in place, so neither can be swapped for the other.
Does the Core Ultra 7 356H or the Core Ultra X7 358H have integrated graphics?
Both do: Intel Graphics on the Core Ultra 7 356H and Intel Arc B390 GPU on the Core Ultra X7 358H.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.