Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Processors/Comparison

15 specifications

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V vs Intel Core Ultra 7 355

On paper, the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V boosts higher. Specifications describe what each chip is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V compared with Intel Core Ultra 7 355, specification by specification
12 specifications · 2 with a higher side

Intel Core Ultra 7 256V

Intel · Core Ultra 200V (Lunar Lake) · Laptop

Intel Core Ultra 7 355

Intel · Core Ultra Series 3 (Panther Lake) · Laptop

Cores and clocks

Cores
8
8
Threads
8
8
Base clock
2.2 GHz
2.3 GHz (higher on this specification)
Boost clock
4.8 GHz (higher on this specification)
4.7 GHz

Cache and power

L3 cache
12 MB
12 MB
TDP
17 W
25 W
Maximum turbo power
37 W
Not verified
Minimum assured power
8 W
Not verified

Platform

Socket
FCBGA2833
FCBGA2540
Process
3 nm
Not verified
Integrated graphics
Intel Arc 140V GPU
Intel Graphics
Launched
Q3'24 (quarter)
Q1'26 (quarter)

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

Boost clock

The Core Ultra 7 256V boosts to 4.8 GHz against 4.7 GHz, 2 percent higher. Across generations it is not a guide to speed on its own, for the reason above. Boost is also a peak: it is held for seconds to minutes, on one or two cores, while the cooling and the power limit allow. What either chip settles at under a long load is lower, and it depends on the cooler and the motherboard as much as the chip.

Power and cooling

The Core Ultra 7 355 is rated at 25 W against 17 W. The rating is the heat the cooler has to move for the chip to hold its speed, and modern chips draw well above it in short bursts. In a laptop the maker chooses the real limit inside a range, so the same chip can behave like two different processors in two machines. That spread is what a sustained test measures and a specification sheet cannot. A chip whose cooling falls short does not fail. It slows down, and it does so after the first minute, which is why short benchmarks miss it.

Platform

Laptop processors are soldered to the board, so this is a choice between machines, not between chips you can swap. What differs between two laptops with these parts is mostly the power limit and the cooling the maker gave each one.

Which to pick, on paper

A quiet or compact build
Core Ultra 7 256V
17 W against 25 W: less heat to move, so a smaller cooler and slower fans.

What no table says

How much of its speed a processor keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Questions

Is the Core Ultra 7 256V better than the Core Ultra 7 355?
By need, on the specifications: a quiet or compact build: the Core Ultra 7 256V. No specification says how much speed either one keeps under a long load; that depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in, and it is what a sustained test measures.
Do the Core Ultra 7 256V and the Core Ultra 7 355 use the same socket?
Laptop processors are soldered in place, so neither can be swapped for the other.
Does the Core Ultra 7 256V or the Core Ultra 7 355 have integrated graphics?
Both do: Intel Arc 140V GPU on the Core Ultra 7 256V and Intel Graphics on the Core Ultra 7 355.
Which runs hotter, the Core Ultra 7 256V or the Core Ultra 7 355?
The Core Ultra 7 355 is rated at 25 W against 17 W, so it produces more heat under load and needs the larger cooler. How hot either one actually runs depends on the cooler and the case more than on the chip.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.