Processors/Comparison
15 specifications
Intel Core i5-4690 vs AMD FX-4100
On paper, the Intel Core i5-4690 boosts higher, and the AMD FX-4100 carries more L3 cache. Specifications describe what each chip is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.
Intel Core i5-4690
Intel · Core 4th generation · Desktop
AMD FX-4100
AMD · FX · Desktop
Cores and clocks
Cache and power
Platform
A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.
Reading the table
What the difference means.
Boost clock
The Core i5-4690 boosts to 3.9 GHz against 3.8 GHz, 3 percent higher. Across generations it is not a guide to speed on its own, for the reason above. Boost is also a peak: it is held for seconds to minutes, on one or two cores, while the cooling and the power limit allow. What either chip settles at under a long load is lower, and it depends on the cooler and the motherboard as much as the chip.
Cache
The FX-4100 carries 8 MB of L3 cache against 6 MB. Cache is fast memory on the chip, and a larger one means the cores wait on main memory less often. Games, large spreadsheets and compiling respond to it; rendering and video export, which stream through data in order, respond much less.
Power and cooling
The FX-4100 is rated at 95 W against 84 W. The rating is the heat the cooler has to move for the chip to hold its speed, and modern chips draw well above it in short bursts. A competent tower cooler suits the FX-4100; the Core i5-4690 is easier to keep quiet and fits smaller cases. A chip whose cooling falls short does not fail. It slows down, and it does so after the first minute, which is why short benchmarks miss it.
Platform
They use different sockets, FCLGA1150 and AM3+, so moving from one to the other means a new motherboard. For an upgrade, that cost belongs in the comparison; for a new build, the newer platform is the one with later chips still to come.
Manufacturing process
The Core i5-4690 is built on a 22 nm process against 32 nm. A finer process generally does the same work for less power. The names are marketing labels rather than measurements, though, and they are not comparable between manufacturers, so treat the row as a sign of how recent the design is and no more.
Which to pick, on paper
- A quiet or compact build
- Core i5-4690
- 84 W against 95 W: less heat to move, so a smaller cooler and slower fans.
What no table says
How much of its speed a processor keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.
Questions
- Is the Core i5-4690 better than the FX-4100?
- By need, on the specifications: a quiet or compact build: the Core i5-4690. No specification says how much speed either one keeps under a long load; that depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in, and it is what a sustained test measures.
- Do the Core i5-4690 and the FX-4100 use the same socket?
- No. The Core i5-4690 uses FCLGA1150 and the FX-4100 uses AM3+, so switching means a new motherboard.
- Which runs hotter, the Core i5-4690 or the FX-4100?
- The FX-4100 is rated at 95 W against 84 W, so it produces more heat under load and needs the larger cooler. How hot either one actually runs depends on the cooler and the case more than on the chip.
More comparisons
- Intel Core i5-4690 vs Intel Core i5-6600
- Intel Core i5-4690 vs Intel Core i5-6600K
- Intel Core i5-4690 vs Intel Core i7-4770
- Intel Core i5-4690 vs Intel Core i7-4770K
- Intel Core i5-4690 vs AMD A8-6600K with Radeon HD 8570D
- AMD FX-4100 vs Intel Core i5-6600
- AMD FX-4100 vs Intel Core i5-6600K
- AMD FX-4100 vs Intel Core i7-4770
- AMD FX-4100 vs Intel Core i7-4770K
- AMD FX-4100 vs AMD A8-6600K with Radeon HD 8570D
Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.
Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.
We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.