Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Processors/Comparison

15 specifications

Intel Core i5-14400 vs AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

On paper, the Intel Core i5-14400 has more cores (10 against 8), the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X boosts higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X carries more L3 cache. Specifications describe what each chip is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

Intel Core i5-14400 compared with AMD Ryzen 7 9700X, specification by specification
10 specifications · 4 with a higher side

Intel Core i5-14400

Intel · Raptor Lake Refresh (14th gen) · Desktop

AMD Ryzen 7 9700X

AMD · Ryzen 9000 (Granite Ridge, Zen 5) · Desktop

Cores and clocks

Cores
10 (higher on this specification)
8
Threads
16
16
Base clock
2.5 GHz
3.8 GHz (higher on this specification)
Boost clock
4.7 GHz
5.5 GHz (higher on this specification)

Cache and power

L3 cache
20 MB
32 MB (higher on this specification)
TDP
65 W
65 W

Platform

Socket
FCLGA1700
AM5
Process
Not verified
4 nm
Integrated graphics
Intel UHD Graphics 730
AMD Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2, 2 CU)
Launched
2024-01-08
2024-08-08

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

Cores and threads

The Core i5-14400 has 10 cores and 16 threads against 8 and 16. More threads help with work that can be split into many pieces at once: rendering, compiling, video export, running several heavy programs together. They do little for work that runs on a few threads, which includes most games and most everyday software, where the speed of one core decides the result.

Boost clock

The Ryzen 7 9700X boosts to 5.5 GHz against 4.7 GHz, 17 percent higher. Across generations it is not a guide to speed on its own, for the reason above. Boost is also a peak: it is held for seconds to minutes, on one or two cores, while the cooling and the power limit allow. What either chip settles at under a long load is lower, and it depends on the cooler and the motherboard as much as the chip.

Cache

The Ryzen 7 9700X carries 32 MB of L3 cache against 20 MB. Cache is fast memory on the chip, and a larger one means the cores wait on main memory less often. Games, large spreadsheets and compiling respond to it; rendering and video export, which stream through data in order, respond much less.

Power and cooling

Both are rated at 65 W, so they ask the same of a cooler and a power supply. The rating is the heat to be moved for the chip to hold its speed; both draw above it in short bursts, and either one slows down rather than fails when the cooling falls short.

Platform

They use different sockets, FCLGA1700 and AM5, so moving from one to the other means a new motherboard, and new memory as well: FCLGA1700 takes DDR4 or DDR5, depending on the motherboard, AM5 takes DDR5. For an upgrade, that cost belongs in the comparison; for a new build, the newer platform is the one with later chips still to come.

What no table says

How much of its speed a processor keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Questions

Is the Core i5-14400 better than the Ryzen 7 9700X?
On the specifications they are closely matched. No specification says how much speed either one keeps under a long load; that depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in, and it is what a sustained test measures.
Do the Core i5-14400 and the Ryzen 7 9700X use the same socket?
No. The Core i5-14400 uses FCLGA1700 and the Ryzen 7 9700X uses AM5, so switching means a new motherboard and new memory.
Does the Core i5-14400 or the Ryzen 7 9700X have integrated graphics?
Both do: Intel UHD Graphics 730 on the Core i5-14400 and AMD Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2, 2 CU) on the Ryzen 7 9700X.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.