Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Processors/Comparison

15 specifications

Intel Core i3-10100 vs Intel Core i3-9100

On paper, the Intel Core i3-10100 boosts higher. Specifications describe what each chip is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

Intel Core i3-10100 compared with Intel Core i3-9100, specification by specification
10 specifications · 2 with a higher side

Intel Core i3-10100

Intel · Core 10th generation · Desktop

Intel Core i3-9100

Intel · Core 9th generation · Desktop

Cores and clocks

Cores
4
4
Threads
8 (higher on this specification)
4
Base clock
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost clock
4.3 GHz (higher on this specification)
4.2 GHz

Cache and power

L3 cache
6 MB
6 MB
TDP
65 W
65 W

Platform

Socket
FCLGA1200
FCLGA1151
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Integrated graphics
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Launched
Q2'20 (quarter)
Q2'19 (quarter)

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

Cores and threads

The Core i3-10100 has 4 cores and 8 threads against 4 and 4. More threads help with work that can be split into many pieces at once: rendering, compiling, video export, running several heavy programs together. They do little for work that runs on a few threads, which includes most games and most everyday software, where the speed of one core decides the result.

Boost clock

The Core i3-10100 boosts to 4.3 GHz against 4.2 GHz, 2 percent higher. Across generations it is not a guide to speed on its own, for the reason above. Boost is also a peak: it is held for seconds to minutes, on one or two cores, while the cooling and the power limit allow. What either chip settles at under a long load is lower, and it depends on the cooler and the motherboard as much as the chip.

Power and cooling

Both are rated at 65 W, so they ask the same of a cooler and a power supply. The rating is the heat to be moved for the chip to hold its speed; both draw above it in short bursts, and either one slows down rather than fails when the cooling falls short.

Platform

They use different sockets, FCLGA1200 and FCLGA1151, so moving from one to the other means a new motherboard. For an upgrade, that cost belongs in the comparison; for a new build, the newer platform is the one with later chips still to come.

Which to pick, on paper

Rendering, compiling, video export
Core i3-10100
8 threads against 4. Work that uses every thread scales with how many there are.

What no table says

How much of its speed a processor keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Questions

Is the Core i3-10100 better than the Core i3-9100?
By need, on the specifications: rendering, compiling, video export: the Core i3-10100. No specification says how much speed either one keeps under a long load; that depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in, and it is what a sustained test measures.
Do the Core i3-10100 and the Core i3-9100 use the same socket?
No. The Core i3-10100 uses FCLGA1200 and the Core i3-9100 uses FCLGA1151, so switching means a new motherboard.
Does the Core i3-10100 or the Core i3-9100 have integrated graphics?
Both do: Intel UHD Graphics 630 on the Core i3-10100 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 on the Core i3-9100.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.