Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Processors/Comparison

15 specifications

AMD Athlon 200GE vs Intel Core i3-540

On the specifications we can verify, the AMD Athlon 200GE and the Intel Core i3-540 are closely matched. Which one is faster on your desk depends on cooling and sustained behaviour rather than on anything printed here.

AMD Athlon 200GE compared with Intel Core i3-540, specification by specification
10 specifications · 1 with a higher side

AMD Athlon 200GE

AMD · Athlon · Desktop

Intel Core i3-540

Intel · Intel · Desktop

Cores and clocks

Cores
2
2
Threads
4
4
Base clock
3.2 GHz (higher on this specification)
3.1 GHz
Boost clock
Not verified
Not verified

Cache and power

L3 cache
4 MB
4 MB
TDP
35 W
73 W

Platform

Socket
AM4
FCLGA1156
Process
14 nm
32 nm
Integrated graphics
Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Not verified
Launched
Not verified
Q1'10 (quarter)

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Reading the table

What the difference means.

Power and cooling

The Core i3-540 is rated at 73 W against 35 W. The rating is the heat the cooler has to move for the chip to hold its speed, and modern chips draw well above it in short bursts. A competent tower cooler suits the Core i3-540; the Athlon 200GE is easier to keep quiet and fits smaller cases. A chip whose cooling falls short does not fail. It slows down, and it does so after the first minute, which is why short benchmarks miss it.

Platform

They use different sockets, AM4 and FCLGA1156, so moving from one to the other means a new motherboard. For an upgrade, that cost belongs in the comparison; for a new build, the newer platform is the one with later chips still to come.

Manufacturing process

The Athlon 200GE is built on a 14 nm process against 32 nm. A finer process generally does the same work for less power. The names are marketing labels rather than measurements, though, and they are not comparable between manufacturers, so treat the row as a sign of how recent the design is and no more.

Which to pick, on paper

A quiet or compact build
Athlon 200GE
35 W against 73 W: less heat to move, so a smaller cooler and slower fans.

What no table says

How much of its speed a processor keeps after the first minute depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in. If you own one of these, measure it: the test is free and runs in this browser.

Questions

Is the Athlon 200GE better than the Core i3-540?
By need, on the specifications: a quiet or compact build: the Athlon 200GE. No specification says how much speed either one keeps under a long load; that depends on the cooling and the power limit of the machine it is in, and it is what a sustained test measures.
Do the Athlon 200GE and the Core i3-540 use the same socket?
No. The Athlon 200GE uses AM4 and the Core i3-540 uses FCLGA1156, so switching means a new motherboard.
Which runs hotter, the Athlon 200GE or the Core i3-540?
The Core i3-540 is rated at 73 W against 35 W, so it produces more heat under load and needs the larger cooler. How hot either one actually runs depends on the cooler and the case more than on the chip.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.