Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Graphics cards/Comparison

10 specifications

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs AMD Radeon RX 6600

On paper, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 has more shading units. Shading-unit counts are not directly comparable across different architectures, so read that row as context rather than a verdict. Specifications describe what each card is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 compared with AMD Radeon RX 6600, specification by specification
10 specifications · 3 with a higher side

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060

NVIDIA · GeForce RTX 40 · Desktop

AMD Radeon RX 6600

AMD · Radeon RX 6000 · Desktop

Compute

Architecture
Ada Lovelace (AD107-400)
RDNA 2 (Navi 23)
Shading units
3,072 (higher on this specification)
1,792
Base clock
1830 MHz (higher on this specification)
1626 MHz
Boost clock
2460 MHz
2491 MHz (higher on this specification)

Memory

Memory
8 GB
8 GB
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory bus
128-bit
128-bit

Power and platform

TDP
115 W
132 W
Process
5 nm
7 nm
Launched
2023-06-29
2021-10-13

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a graphics card behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.