Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Graphics cards/Comparison

10 specifications

AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs AMD Radeon RX 7600

On paper, the AMD Radeon RX 7600 has more shading units. Shading-unit counts are not directly comparable across different architectures, so read that row as context rather than a verdict. Specifications describe what each card is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

AMD Radeon RX 6600 compared with AMD Radeon RX 7600, specification by specification
10 specifications · 3 with a higher side

AMD Radeon RX 6600

AMD · Radeon RX 6000 · Desktop

AMD Radeon RX 7600

AMD · Radeon RX 7000 · Desktop

Compute

Architecture
RDNA 2 (Navi 23)
RDNA 3 (Navi 33)
Shading units
1,792
2,048 (higher on this specification)
Base clock
1626 MHz
1720 MHz (higher on this specification)
Boost clock
2491 MHz
2655 MHz (higher on this specification)

Memory

Memory
8 GB
8 GB
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory bus
128-bit
128-bit

Power and platform

TDP
132 W
165 W
Process
7 nm
6 nm
Launched
2021-10-13
2023-05-25

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a graphics card behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.