Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Processors/Comparison

10 specifications

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H vs AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

On paper, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS boosts higher. Specifications describe what each chip is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H compared with AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, specification by specification
10 specifications · 2 with a higher side

AMD Ryzen 7 6800H

AMD · Ryzen 6000 (Rembrandt, Zen 3+) · Laptop

AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS

AMD · Ryzen 7040 (Phoenix, Zen 4) · Laptop

Cores and clocks

Cores
8
8
Threads
16
16
Base clock
3.2 GHz
4.0 GHz (higher on this specification)
Boost clock
4.7 GHz
5.2 GHz (higher on this specification)

Cache and power

L3 cache
16 MB
16 MB
TDP
45 W
35 to 54 W

Platform

Socket
FP7
FP7, FP7r2, FP8
Process
6 nm
4 nm
Integrated graphics
AMD Radeon 680M (12 CU)
AMD Radeon 780M (12 CU)
Launched
2022-01-04
2023-04-30

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.