Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Processors/Comparison

10 specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 225F vs AMD Ryzen 7 7700

On paper, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225F has more cores (10 against 8), the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 boosts higher, and the AMD Ryzen 7 7700 carries more L3 cache. Specifications describe what each chip is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

Intel Core Ultra 5 225F compared with AMD Ryzen 7 7700, specification by specification
10 specifications · 5 with a higher side

Intel Core Ultra 5 225F

Intel · Arrow Lake-S (Core Ultra 200S) · Desktop

AMD Ryzen 7 7700

AMD · Ryzen 7000 (Raphael, Zen 4) · Desktop

Cores and clocks

Cores
10 (higher on this specification)
8
Threads
10
16 (higher on this specification)
Base clock
3.3 GHz
3.8 GHz (higher on this specification)
Boost clock
4.9 GHz
5.3 GHz (higher on this specification)

Cache and power

L3 cache
20 MB
32 MB (higher on this specification)
TDP
65 W
65 W

Platform

Socket
FCLGA1851
AM5
Process
3 nm
5 nm
Integrated graphics
None
AMD Radeon Graphics (RDNA 2, 2 CU)
Launched
Not verified
2023-01-10

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.