Processors/Comparison
10 specifications
Intel Core i5-12400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600
On paper, the Intel Core i5-12400F boosts higher, and the AMD Ryzen 5 3600 carries more L3 cache. Specifications describe what each chip is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.
Intel Core i5-12400F
Intel · Alder Lake (12th gen) · Desktop
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
AMD · Ryzen 3000 (Matisse, Zen 2) · Desktop
Cores and clocks
Cache and power
Platform
A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.
More comparisons
- Intel Core i5-12400F vs Intel Core i5-9600K
- Intel Core i5-12400F vs Intel Core i7-8700K
- Intel Core i5-12400F vs Intel Core i5-11400F
- Intel Core i5-12400F vs Intel Core i5-12500
- Intel Core i5-12400F vs AMD Ryzen 5 5500
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i5-12500
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 8500G
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs Intel Core i7-8700K
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 8600G
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- AMD Ryzen 5 3600 vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600
Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.
Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.
We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.