Processor and graphics card specifications are live

Processors/Comparison

10 specifications

Intel Core i3-12100F vs Intel Core i3-14100F

On paper, the Intel Core i3-14100F boosts higher. Specifications describe what each chip is designed to do; how much of that either one holds under continuous load is a separate question.

Intel Core i3-12100F compared with Intel Core i3-14100F, specification by specification
10 specifications · 2 with a higher side

Intel Core i3-12100F

Intel · Alder Lake (12th gen) · Desktop

Intel Core i3-14100F

Intel · Raptor Lake Refresh (14th gen) · Desktop

Cores and clocks

Cores
4
4
Threads
8
8
Base clock
3.3 GHz
3.5 GHz (higher on this specification)
Boost clock
4.3 GHz
4.7 GHz (higher on this specification)

Cache and power

L3 cache
12 MB
12 MB
TDP
58 W
58 W

Platform

Socket
FCLGA1700
FCLGA1700
Process
Not verified
Not verified
Integrated graphics
None
None
Launched
2022-01-04
2024-01-08

A check marks the higher figure only on rows where higher is unambiguously better. Rows without one are not ties; they are specifications where “better” has no meaning.

Every figure on this table is a design target. None of it is a measurement.

Nothing above describes how a processor behaves twenty minutes into a sustained workload, which is where two chips with nearly identical specifications routinely diverge. A boost clock is a ceiling the vendor permits, not a rate the chip sustains, and whether it holds depends on the cooling, the case, the power profile and the room. None of those appear on a specification sheet.

We deliberately do not reduce these figures to a single score. A composite invented from specifications would look authoritative and measure nothing, and choosing the weights would be choosing the winner.